Originally, when I learned about the concept of mind maps that is often taught in our schools, I thought it was a good idea to introduce students, especially younger ones, to cognitive thinking, which could be a good foundation for the subject of psychology later. . Now, I have reversed my thinking because 2D linear mind maps mislead a child, adolescent, or student on how the human mind actually works, which could cause problems later on. Okay, let’s talk.
You see, recently someone asked me about mind maps and how our group of experts dealt with objects and context, maybe trying to develop a better program to do all of this electronically through software or programming the essence of an interface system. most primordial artificial intelligence. Good idea, I would say. Still, I must say that personally, I have been a harsh critic of mind map schemes, as many do not seem appropriate for the way the mind works most efficiently, and just as the tree of science wanders. by the tangent. , limits future human discoveries to the less traveled or clipped (removed) branches of the mind map itself.
Just because there is no branch there does not mean that a supernet network does not exist or cannot be placed in a quantum way to jump or jump to secondary or tertiary ways of thinking, reasoning, creating or solving. – thus, connect with all knowledge, memory, information. Mind maps, most of the ones I have seen, seem to be, unfortunately, mind traps in 2D and even in 3D, if you leave the operator with the belief that this is all it is, it forces them to think in the box. Not so smart.
In fact, I told my acquaintance that maybe the mind maps I had looked at were inappropriate, why deal with increased linear complexity and diminishing returns of cartographic concepts from past periods? Have you noticed the recent science and research on leaf designs and how nutrients are distributed throughout a tree leaf, ensuring that even if the leaf is damaged in one place, it continues to survive regardless? It sure reminds me of the cellular structures of the human brain. Use what works in nature, design the rest, then you might find that you can enhance the best of that evolutionary process.
What I am trying to say is this: current mind mapping programs are not good enough, inferior and misleading so I can’t see how useful that is, it may actually be a detriment and we could be trying very hard. harm our future generations in promoting the current versions that exist. Consider all of this and think about it.